Modern football begins before kick-off — in contracts, payrolls, broadcasting, and betting. 

According to Stephen Dobson and John Goddard's book "The Economics of Football", the game is an industry shaped by financial power, labour markets, management, spectators, media rights, and gambling. 

And 2026 is the biggest the World Cup economy has gotten to date.

Staged from 11 June to 19 July across the US, Canada and Mexico, the tournament has expanded from 32 to 48 teams and from Qatar's 64 matches to more than 100 over six weeks. Its scale, North American markets and favourable global viewing hours make it the largest World Cup yet, both economically and financially.

FIFA's revenues stood at $4.64 billion in 2018, then $766 million in 2019, $267 million in 2020, $766 million in 2021 and $5.77 billion in 2022. 

It fell to $1.17 billion in 2023 and $483 million in 2024, reached $2.66 billion in 2025 and is projected at a record $8.91 billion in 2026, 54.5% above 2022 and almost 92% above 2018.

According to an analysis by Statista, this season, broadcasting rights should generate $3.93 billion, or 44%; hospitality and tickets $3.02 billion, or 34%. Together they provide 78%. Marketing contributes $1.786 billion, or 20%; licensing $111 million, or 1%; and other income $72 million, also about 1%.

Statista estimates, using FIFA and World Trade Organization information, suggest a $17.2 billion addition to US GDP, about 0.05% of output. Accommodation and food contribute $2.4 billion; real estate $2 billion; wholesale and retail $1.5 billion; technical and professional work $1.3 billion; finance and insurance $1.1 billion; public administration and defence $1.1 billion; and other sectors $7.8 billion, around 45%.

Squads, stars and sporting assets

The International Centre for Sports Studies (CIES) values the teams of England at €1.45 billion, France at €1.44 billion, Spain at €1.41 billion, Germany at €1.09 billion and Portugal at €910 million. England, France and Spain each exceed €1.4 billion.

Lamine Yamal is valued at €358 million, Erling Haaland €227 million, Kylian Mbappé €166 million, Morgan Rogers €137 million, and Kenan Yıldız is valued at €133 million. Yamal is €131 million above Haaland and worth twice more than Mbappé, reflecting age, performance, potential and long-term value.

Prizes, trophies and connected footballs

World Cup winners received $2.2 million in 1982, $2.8 million in 1986, $3.5 million in 1990, $4 million in 1994, $6 million in 1998, $8 million in 2002, $20 million in 2006, $30 million in 2010, $35 million in 2014, $38 million in 2018 and $42 million in 2022. 

The 2026 winner is set to receive $50 million — $8 million, or 19%, more than the winners of 2022 and over 22 times the 1982 award. 

The 18-carat-gold trophy of 2022 was designed by Italian sculptor Silvio Gazzaniga. Uruguay 1930's T-model and Tiento were stitched leather with external laces; England 1966's Challenge 4-Star refined the form. Mexico 1970's Adidas Telstar used black-and-white panels for monochrome television, while the 1982 Tango España established a decorative template. 

Statista estimates, using FIFA and World Trade Organization information, suggest a $17.2 billion addition to US GDP, about 0.05% of output. Accommodation and food contribute $2.4 billion; real estate $2 billion; wholesale and retail $1.5 billion; technical and professional work $1.3 billion; finance and insurance $1.1 billion; public administration and defence $1.1 billion; and other sectors $7.8 billion, around 45%.

The synthetic Azteca ball of 1986 improved durability, water resistance and consistency; the 2002 Fevernova introduced a new panel structure. Germany 2006's fewer-panel Teamgeist produced smoother flight; black and white referenced Germany and gold lines, the trophy. The 2026 "Trionda" has a motion sensor transmitting contact, speed, movement and position data, helping officials identify when it is struck.

The betting boom

The 2026 World Cup is expected to become the largest betting event in history, with more than $50 billion (£37.4 billion) wagered globally, up from about $35 billion in 2022. 

The increase reflects the expansion to 48 teams, more than 100 matches and wider legal access to sports betting in the US, where around 65% of the population can now place bets. 

Analyst Chad Benyon told Fox Sports that the surge could be a "flash in the pan" unless operators turn occasional customers into "repeat, multi-sport bettors". Campaigners are more concerned about harm. 

Les Bernal of Stop Predatory Gambling told Fox Sports, "Hundreds of thousands of people across the world, especially young men, will suffer life-changing debt and financial distress." The Betting and Gaming Council argues that regulated firms provide protections including age checks, deposit limits and self-exclusion.

Prediction-market mania

The wagers surrounding the tournament show how one goal can move enormous sums of money. A FanDuel customer placed $500 on a 10-part bet combining several sports with four World Cup group winners. After waiting more than four months for every result, the bettor collected $30,222. On Polymarket, another trader risked $1.2 million on Canada beating South Africa. 

The bet remained in danger until Stephen Eustaquio scored in the 92nd minute, producing almost $1.085 million in profit. 

Such examples explain the appeal of prediction markets, but also the danger: large returns depend on uncertain events that can change in seconds. US regulators are now considering tighter restrictions, while prediction market platform Kalshi has already withdrawn controversial bets linked to the Iran and Ukraine wars.

The World Cup now concentrates media rights, tourism, labour, technology, investment and gambling on an unprecedented scale. The spectacle remains on the pitch, but the economy surrounds every kick. Wealthy bettors may absorb large losses; ordinary supporters cannot. Never bet more than you can afford to lose.

The data collection and compilation for this article were carried out by M Samin Sajid Nahr of TBS Research Team.

FIFA World Cup 2026 / USA / Football / Economy

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderation decisions are subjective. Published comments are readers’ own views and The Business Standard does not endorse any of the readers’ comments.

Copyright © 2026 THE BUSINESS STANDARD
All rights reserved.